Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:50

Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ten takeaways from WSJ report that BNY approached Northern Trust about a merger - Global Custodian
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Pokémon Cafe’s new Mega Charizard curry plate is a work of art in more ways than one - SoraNews24
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
ASCO day 2: A tragic paradox, Gilead updates, and lots of Pfizer news - statnews.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Job openings rise in middle of trade wars, but businesses are slower to hire - MarketWatch
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The Best Deals Today: Steam Summer Sale, Twin Peaks, Super Mario Odyssey, and More - IGN
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sorting Out Long COVID Symptoms in Babies - Medscape
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.